Zum Inhalt der Seite gehen


Europe, the AI Continent.

One year ago, we launched the AI Continent Action Plan. Since then, we have made huge strides:

✅ 19 AI factories are now live across EU countries.
✅ We established the AI Skills Academy to train experts.
✅ The AI Omnibus is cutting costs for business.
✅ We have earmarked €1 billion to support AI adoption in industry.

We are building a secure and innovative AI future for Europe.

Here's how 👉 link.europa.eu/nj3VH9

Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (3 Wochen her)
Als Antwort auf European Commission

stop this aishit until its too late for our economy, planet and people.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

ugh

What about any initiatives to train AI models on properly licensed content? Have you considered partnering with the Fairly Trained initiative?

We lack LLMs that are trained on proper content, they're all trained on plagiarized and stolen work, including copyrighted texts.

Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (3 Wochen her)
Als Antwort auf European Commission

you know, the link you provided explains none of your claims. What even is an AI factory? Or the AI Omnibus? Seems like your post was made with AI too :/
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (3 Wochen her)
Als Antwort auf European Commission

Reading the room is not the forté of whoever is doing the social media strategy of the EU commission
Als Antwort auf European Commission

Burning the planet to generate unverified bullshit; stealing from creators; poisoning the whole process of generation, presentation, teaching, and usage of knowledge; helping to fire qualified professionals by the thousands, to replace them with unqualified babbling machines; inflating an irresponsible investment bubble until it bursts, resulting in unprecedented damage.

You're proud of your work of utter destruction? You fools. You're enemies of humankind.

"#AI" #EU #EUpol

#eu #ai #eupol
Als Antwort auf European Commission

no, thank you. Tell your AI slop bot to fuck off, please, and get our money back.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

Your dishonest AF AI propaganda fails to mention that you're recklessly abolishing our rights as citizens *and* authors/creators, shamelessly selling our data to fascists that seek to destroy democracy and freedom, and at the same time fuel GHG emissions.

You traitors will be prosecuted for your crimes.

Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (3 Wochen her)
Als Antwort auf European Commission

I like you and I'm glad there's a big EU institution active on the fediverse, but as with chat control, you deserve every single comment heading your way.

CRINGE.

Als Antwort auf European Commission

Don't do this. Your job is to represent and take care of the 450 million people who live in the EU, not half a dozen foreign billionaires who are getting rich from the ludicrous "AI" hype.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

Since ever single comment here is negative, and rightly so, I say: all of the above.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

Learn to read the room. The money you waste on those harmful slop machines will not earn you a medal here.

Maybe try to protect the EU's citizens against the very technology you are hyping. It costs less, values actual humans more than corporations, and may even get you some applause on the Fediverse.

Als Antwort auf European Commission

making easier for the bros to spoil our environment, render us jobless, propagate disinformation, cause mental health issues and even suicides, etc. for a plagiarism machine that barely does an acceptable job at the 3-4 real use cases is surely not the way to go. Why are you pushing for something no one wants (would you want to live near a datacenter? Me neither). Why don't we use this money to make europeans lives better? You don't care about anything but money, and that's gross.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

50 % error ratio, wasting energy and water, fake caring about human beings... Yeah,. I see you Europe, you really are AI.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

Why this desperate intent for selling a broken tool that's far from perfect and brings more prejudicial than benefits?
Als Antwort auf European Commission

the AI continent ?!?! your "achievements" sounds more like "AI slavery continent"
Als Antwort auf European Commission

For once, can you NOT repeat the US BS, but 10y later? Don't you fucking see? Can we be the Human Continent instead?
Als Antwort auf European Commission

until the bubble bursts and you realize you burned a lot of money and resources
Als Antwort auf European Commission

No I think you've misunderstood. We need to REDUCE our energy usage, not increase! And certainly not by building more Slop factories.
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (3 Wochen her)
Als Antwort auf European Commission

take care .. are you paying our future overlords to invade our privacy, take our data, manipulate us algorithmically, and send us the adverts?

What is this for?

Als Antwort auf European Commission

only we don't want AI slop to waste our energy and clean water,big oil already does enough to fuck up our environment
Als Antwort auf European Commission

please stop, AI is unreliable, bad for the environment, bad for critical thinking, bad for the cost of living, and many other bad things. The good doesn't outweight the bad

stop, please 🙁

Als Antwort auf European Commission

Is our European AI supply chain clean or is it based on theft and extortion of humans and the environment like the others?
Als Antwort auf European Commission

please, please, please with sugar on top: don't do this. I can see every day at work what AI is doing and long story short: it is nothing good. I'd rather see a unified European Health Insurance or unified European retirement fonds. One social system for all member states. That would be something to be proud of, not wasting our ressources on AI.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

AI is a scam that is slowly but surely destroying our environment. Please stop that nonsense.
Als Antwort auf ralocycleuse

Hi @ralocycleuse! The EU AI Act already includes environmental protection provisions. Providers of general-purpose AI models, which are trained on large data amounts and therefore prone to high energy consumption, must disclose their energy consumption. In case of general-purpose AI models with systemic risks, energy efficiency needs to be assessed. You can find more information here: link.europa.eu/rJPDpD
Als Antwort auf European Commission

I suppose the projects themselves aren’t even the worst part, it’s how stupidly proud you are of them.
Als Antwort auf پویان Pouyan

Hi @i! AI Factories are hubs for innovation, bringing together computing power, data, and talent to create advanced AI models. They connect universities, industries, and supercomputing centers to develop AI solutions for areas like health, climate, and manufacturing. You can find more information here: link.europa.eu/8xyx8t
Als Antwort auf European Commission

Please make a screenshot of all the comments and send it to your superior. Ask them to send it to their superiors, until it reaches those in charge.

Here are people who know a thing or two about tech begging you to stop your PR and listen for once!

We can't afford to fall for every snake oil grift US Big Tech throws at us! We need the EU and those in charge to be really smart now, because as others have written, there's a lot at stake! Dare to resist the hype, for all our sakes!

Als Antwort auf European Commission

boosting open source projects that are already proven to be a staple on everyone's lives?

NO! Better invest in the latest scam scheme!! Make us even more reliant on American tech corporations!!!!

🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴

Als Antwort auf European Commission

you mean the illusionary intelligence Continent? Make no mistake LLMs are not intelligent and are designed to fool humans.
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (3 Wochen her)
Als Antwort auf European Commission

you are shaming yourselves (AND ourselves because we elected you) falling for the AI scam
Als Antwort auf European Commission

Do i understand you correctly that you will abolish any copyright, intellectual property and non-tamper laws immediately? Because thats what this means. Or you just create a second tier law for tech-lords who are allowed to break said laws and degrade literally everyone else - in that case we can assume this is a power grab by corruption.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

And how exactly do you plan your budgets for all those that are replaced with AI?

Also thank you for supporting AI, I really love speaking to AI instead of human on Customer Support.
It works exactly how one would expect - it doesn't.

Yes, we shall innovate in AI, but not fund its adoption in industry. That's on those who use it.

Use the money for defense and moving from Microslop's & Google's products to Open-Source

Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (3 Wochen her)
Als Antwort auf European Commission

Absolutely Insulting. Stop it. Give that billion Euro to the poor. Earmark it for people fleeing and drowning in the Mediterranean Sea. Anything but this shit.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

Read. The. Room.

A *lot* of the people on Mastodon are creators who have had their intellectual property stolen to feed the generative AI models, with at least one of the billionaires involved openly admitting/bragging that his business model would not be profitable if they had to pay fair royalties for that intellectual property.

A lot of people on Mastodon are deeply concerned about the environmental damage, AI hallucinations, theft of personal/corporate data, and sundry other issues.

There are forms of analytical AI that are useful (e.g. analysis of medical images) and do not involve any of the above. You do not appear to be referring to such analytical models.

Als Antwort auf European Commission

Make Europe a science continent instead!
AI as in "we scan you and all your data without you being able to prevent this" is horrible, nobody wants that.
AI as a mathematical algorithm can be helpful in lots of applications - as any other algorithm. But this doesn't need pushing AI methods, just a solid funding of science! Scientists will use the method with the best results for their applications!

No to AI slop, surveillance & abuse, yes to a right to privacy & digital security!

Als Antwort auf European Commission

if you keep pushing that, probably only AI will live on this continent in 30years.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

@EUCommission, make really REALLY sure that it is safe! AI is an extinction level risk! Alignment is required! Don't make it more intelligent than it needs to be. Beware giving it guns.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

It's an odd contrast between the usual positivity on this account and this dystopian announcement.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

holy shitballs, that is THE absolutest worst thing this account ever posted.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

these are not achievements. If you want public support, provide concrete evidence of how AI is delivering *net* benefit to UN Sustainable Development Goals. Tell us how AI is helping people and planet, not how businesses are saving money by laying off people or constructing new data centers that overheat the planet for memes.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

there are a lot of assumptions in this that should be questioned rigorously.

Statistical convergence is not progress.

It's change that the deluded consider progress.

And please, next time print this on more absorbent paper.

This chafes. 🙃

Als Antwort auf European Commission

you are selling our data for money. This is not a good idea. You are only listening to lobbyists. Start listening to experts that do not want to sell our dignity for money.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

this is embarrassing, and all for a technology that has no proven return on investment but abundant proven liabilities.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

€1 billion wasted. These are resources that could be better spent elsewhere
Als Antwort auf European Commission

you already had experts, you had academics who study every area impacted by AI, you're just not listening to them
Als Antwort auf European Commission

I have never seen a post get this much hatred on here. While I agree with the sentiment I am enjoying every second of it lol
Als Antwort auf European Commission

The AI boom is based on a big lie designed to steal money without delivering anything useful. You are being defrauded by the American tech sector.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

please, pretty please, in the spirit of “keep your friends close and your enemies closer”, please aim to sabotage it so that we can focus on meaningful things instead of destructive and unethical things. Thank you 🙏
Als Antwort auf European Commission

No, seriously. Take a stand on this nonsense. It's built on stolen work and hidden labour, it's burning up our already scarce resources at a terrifying rate, it's really really bad for people's brains and even if it worked (which it doesn't) it would put billions of people out of work in a really short timescale. Who's going to pay taxes then? How does society cope when you wipe out the incomes of a huge tranche of its working population and give them... nothing in return?

We don't need this stuff, and we're certainly not ready for it, even IF it worked.

Als Antwort auf European Commission

Imagine what you could have done if you had ignored a hype wave pushed by grifters and scammers and instead invested that money in things that will actually improve the economy and social wellbeing.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

Curious to hear how building our digital sovereignty from American BigTech is going!

Turning off all Big Tech solutions being used by all governments and vital infrastructure in Europe would have us descend into total chaos!

However, the EU Commission is apparently more concerned with FOMO in missing the race to the abyss with AI slop!

Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (3 Wochen her)
Als Antwort auf European Commission

If by AI you mean LLMs, you’re pouring a lot of resources into a flawed, environmentally, and socially disastrous, technology.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

Generative AI is a scam and I only hope the bubble bursts before you can sink more money into this bullshit.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

Simply swearing at you would not sufficiently express how much anger I've come to bottle up, so I won't do it, as much as I would want to. I find you repulsive beyond words.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

What about supporting "datacenters" called brains? Have you ever thought about investing this amount in education, i.e. in kindergarten, schools and universities? 🤨
Als Antwort auf European Commission

The old Europe was made on the back of environmental destruction, cultural genocide, slave labour, and theft.

The new Europe is being made of... [*checks notes*] wow you guys really have not changed.

Als Antwort auf European Commission

I really wish EU would focus on actual AI research opportunities that are likely to yield significant improvements in the long term, not dead-ends like genAI.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

I wonder if this toot is GAI generated? Nothing makes sense for me.
When everybody is quietly receding, EU comes boasting about it...
Als Antwort auf European Commission

The second paragraph has strong "Yesterday we were on the edge of an abyss. Today we are a big step further." energy.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

I would much rather you support Ukraine more and kick out Hungary. Oh, and write posts yourself. Be Human Continent.

Update after election: ok, we can keep Hungary!

Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (2 Wochen her)
Als Antwort auf European Commission

La IA ya sé ha usado para decidir cuantos miles de niños mueren y cuantos no en guerras. ¿Ya se usa la IA europea para decidir objetivos militares o cuanto falta para eso? El uso en medicina e investigación de LLMs es algo minoritario, y hasta ahora las IA's han matado más personas que las que ha salvado. ¿Cuanta agua habéis robado al consumo humano para eso, a cuanta gente le habéis cuadruplicado el precio de la electricidad y el agua potable, a cuantas habéis dejado sin trabajo?
Als Antwort auf European Commission

How is this compatible with tackling the climate crisis? Wouldn't this money be better used to promote human intelligence instead for a change?
Als Antwort auf European Commission

I see a lot of initiative to support open source out there in Europe.

I have a simple suggestion, whatever you do, make it open-source and make AI training and inference available to regular folks.

Don't build a single, centralized model.

Als Antwort auf European Commission

Seriously? You want to (1) destroy the only planet we have, (2) give loads of technical wealth to people who already have more than they know what to do with, at the expense of everyone else, (3) support the wholesale theft of all original work in order to make those people richer? Stop believing their hype and hypocrisy.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

I don’t know if this account is actually monitored, or just a publishing place, but you may have noticed that this post has received almost overwhelmingly negative responses.

You could disregard this as Mastodon bias, but keep in mind that the biggest bias on Mastodon is that people who understand and built core parts of the information technology that you use every day are massively over represented. This is probably the only place you will get a lot of replies from people who both understand technology and do not have a financial incentive to hype things to get large amounts of government funding.

EDIT: I should add, I used machine learning during my PhD and there are a lot of problems for which it is a really good fit. But, in the current climate, it’s generally safe to interpret ‘AI’ as meaning ‘machine learning applied to a problem where machine learning is the wrong solution’. It isn’t a technology, it’s a branding term, and it’s a branding term used almost exclusively for things that have no social benefit.

Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (3 Wochen her)
Als Antwort auf European Commission

Good morning! I'm here for the replies, and the Commission should be, too. ❤️
Als Antwort auf European Commission

you should be building networks and systems for resilience against AI, not building AI
Als Antwort auf Kahia, a.k.a The Anarchivist

Hi @kahianyaaa! AI already plays a crucial role in our daily lives. As it develops, AI holds even greater potential to improve the lives of EU citizens: enhancing disease prevention, reducing traffic fatalities, anticipating cyber threats, and much more. That's why we are proposing rules and actions for AI, enabling us to harness its full potential and maximise its benefits.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

@kahianyaaa So basically: “we don’t care if you think it’s unethical, we’re going to ram it down your throats like an American corporation anyway!”
Als Antwort auf jess :3

Hi @peachymist! Artificial intelligence already plays a crucial role in our daily lives, and as AI develops, it holds even greater potential to improve the lives of EU citizens: enhancing disease prevention, reducing traffic fatalities, anticipating cyber threats, and much more. That's why we are proposing rules and actions for AI, enabling us to harness its full potential and maximise its benefits.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

Maybe you got @peachymist wrong:

No 👏 one 👏 wants 👏 this 👏 stuff 👏.

You're welcome.
/cc @aral

Als Antwort auf European Commission

@peachymist
It only improves the live of scammers, con men and people spreading misinformation. And yes, by that i mean the users and the ai-companys.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

the things you are describing are useful. But GenAI like ChatGPT and Claude and Copilot being pressure-pushed into everyone's throats by evil and soulless corporations like Meta, Anthropic and OpenAI is something very different and you MUST communicate that distinction. There are differences between the GenAI apps that dumb everyone down, destroy knowledge, spread misinformation and do nothing but enrich the rich and those used in science. When you communicate about AI we need to know which one you mean.
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (2 Wochen her)
Als Antwort auf European Commission

we don't want, we want choice, we want personal data protected from being used for IA training, we want choice about interaction with AI for services, or interaction with humans, and we want to be informed ahead of time if any of our data is going to be processed by AI and mandatory easy access to recourse to humans whenever AI processes data, specially in public services.

We want that all models be Open Source AI, and all data sets to be made fully accessibly by all

@peachymist

Als Antwort auf European Commission

@peachymist you have no idea what a neural net and learning in that context means. Which is used in llm, the thing currently stamped as AI. While this term is a moniker term for all tech that fools users into believing it is intelligent while it is not (hence the artificial in the name)
Als Antwort auf European Commission

it olds greatest potential to ruin our lives, and not only you deciced to not protect us enough from being under surveilance with it, you're also proposing to weaken our personal data protections from it.

@peachymist

Als Antwort auf European Commission

@peachymist I am a Software Developer. AI plays almost no role in my life. There are a few areas where algorithms are not the tool of choice and AI might be a solution (protein folding, translations).

Here is a list that has effects - that’s like potential but even cooler:

Desease Prevention: Tax Sugar, Ban alcohol ads

Reduce traffic fatalities: force speed limits (yeah especially for Germany where I’m from) 120-100 on highway, 30 in cities and towns

There is nothing to “harness”. This is not about “benefits”. Otherwise you wouldn’t repeat TechBros slang and DO something instead of throwing money at dubious and uncertain business models which rob tax money that could have made life’s better.

Als Antwort auf European Commission

the Commission’s first post uses “AI” to describe generative AI infrastructure. Its reply contains use cases where *non-LLM* AI is doing great things. I don’t think LLMs are helping with disease prevention or traffic fatalities. They’re helping write memos.

If the European Commission doesn’t understand the difference between machine learning algorithms and large language models, it shouldn’t make pronouncements about the utility of “AI”.

Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (2 Wochen her)
Als Antwort auf European Commission

@peachymist The only thing that prevents traffic fatalities is eliminating traffic. And you’re doing a terrible work at that. In the last decades the total length of train tracks in Europe decreased. I can’t take a train from Lisbon to Madrid that doesn’t take 4x as long as driving. We keep protecting our corrupt auto industry instead of investing tens of billions of euros per year in transit. No AI needed, just fast, reliable trains, local and cross border. Look at China and japan
Als Antwort auf European Commission

@peachymist

It also holds the potential to relegate huge sectors of the population unemployed, and to replace our thinking processes with mindless deferral. Not to mention how it is burning down the planet and sucking up limited water resources so that it can be wrong most of the time about most things. And devastating the income and credibility of artists and writers, musicians and creators of film, stealing from them and giving no credit. It is a blight, and it needs to be HEAVILY regulated, and completely shunned in most industries.

Als Antwort auf European Commission

@peachymist that's not AI, that's statistics and machine learning, and the work of thousands of researchers whose jobs are being menaced by this reckless run towards "AI"-fication of society
Als Antwort auf European Commission

@peachymist beyond the hype, it’s often wrong, self-referential, and encroaching on other spaces: do a Bing search for “image description” and the summary box suggests using ai tools, which are not only laughably wrong but cannot know the context and relevant details to include.
#slopaganda
Als Antwort auf European Commission

this is one of the worst decisions ever taken in the context of European research funding. You are pumping taxpayer money into machines for training useless models and the companies applying for computing time do not even have to undergo the kind of application procedure that peer-reviewed computational science has to go through. You have substantially reduced the amount of time available to European science and weakened us at a time where we could outperform the competition.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

and we probably shouldn't. What are the social and environmantal costs?!?
Als Antwort auf European Commission

this post is making be ashamed to be a citizen of the european union when otherwise i was mostly a big fan of it.

i think "AI" is used as a marketing term by corrupt business people, selling overpriced general purpose tools that just don't deliver on any of their promises, meanhile undermining scientists developing machine learning algorithms with real usecases and measurable positive effects.

so as long as the EU is using scammers' terminology it is dead to me.

Als Antwort auf European Commission

A more or less virtualised society to reference or even lead real life with… And you believe it to be a good idea? 😏 🧠🔨 #BrainMush It’ll be a proverbial straight jacket to control everything deemed detrimental to our current and flawed economic system. To many it’s a magic box of tricks to get what they want against better judgement and it will be a moloch of a Ponzi scheme money pit. An illusion of control at best. 🤷‍♀️
Als Antwort auf European Commission

I mean, props to you for having the guts to post that here.

That, or you're totally clueless about the Fedi demographic.

But on the other hand, most normal people dislike "AI" too, so I'm not really sure who you're trying to impress here, except maybe for authoritarian tech CEOs.

Als Antwort auf European Commission

seriously, what's wrong with your Yeyo?

  • Stop getting high on your own supply!


gabboman.xyz/fediverse/post/1f…

#Sarcasm #commentary #AI #slop #Enslopification #EUpol

Als Antwort auf European Commission

Give a person power and they will abuse it. No matter how gracefully they may present themselves in the guise of democracy.
I know of only one truly powerful person to whom this does not apply, and that is Pippi Longstocking.
Are you Pippi Longstocking?👀

P.S.: Data centers are burning up the planet, and I’m a little attached to our mothership.

P.P.S.: Your Toot is embarrassing.🫣

Als Antwort auf European Commission

This is not something to brag about.🙄 There is nothing positive about AI as far as civilization is concerned. It is not improving anything. It is incredibly wasteful. It is harming the people who use it and the people whose jobs are lost because of it. To brag about your "huge strides"in building an AI society shows how little you actually know about it.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

By all means, support AI for cases where it actually helps.

But at the same time, there need to be laws to curb the use of AI for purposes where it isn't beneficial. Replacing human creativity, journalism or education with AI has no benefits for society but a significant environmental impact, risk of disinformation and potential for criminal behaviour.

Als Antwort auf European Commission

We have a lot more topic requiering funding more urgently than adding more AI slop.
Als Antwort auf Kobold

Hi @kobold! We work simultaneously on a wide range of priorities, including security and defence, economic competitiveness, democracy, and climate adaptation and environment, and we regularly share updates on them across our social media channels. You can read more about our priorities here: link.europa.eu/Yp6XqT
Als Antwort auf European Commission

if this is what Europe stands for now I don't want to be part of it. Cowards.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

You taut these as if they're achievements to be proud of.

The AI bubble is starting to collapse as reality has caught up that it can't do what it's hyped up as being capable of.

Als Antwort auf European Commission

At least use all that energy to heat houses (by pre-heating water before heating plants).
Als Antwort auf European Commission

will the "AI Factories" be monitored regarding the impact they have on the communities where they are build?
Als Antwort auf European Commission

The E.U. does so much positive, progressive stuff. Unfortunately it also does this.
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (2 Wochen her)
Als Antwort auf European Commission

🤢🤮 And you posted this EU, thinking that citizen would be pleased about this! 😵‍💫 I hope those AI data centres get petrol bombed :molotov:
#DeathToAI
Als Antwort auf European Commission

please stop wasting money on this bubble. Europe has real problems: the rise of authoritarianism and surveillance, disinformation, a lack of digital autonomy, just to name a few. Not being an "AI continent" (whatever that means) is not one of them. Stop competing with America in becoming a capitalist hellscape, and focus on real issues.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

Digital independence is important for all aspects of technology -- AI, cloud, and social networking. Good luck with this effort.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

what a disappointment, falling for the lies of salesmen and not understanding the last thing about so-call "AI"
Als Antwort auf European Commission

"Huge strides" in the direction of water bankruptcy, escalating climate change, needless energy consumption, the degradation of collective human knowledge, the eradication of copyright, error-riddled, inefficient software, creative slop, and lots more besides, all of it bad. Please see sense and stop.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

I have questions.

What exactly is it, that an "AI factory" is producing? Why are you writing about "19" when the press report speaks of "13"? Is this already the magic of AI?

How is that ominous "AI Omnibus" "already" cutting business costs? How are businesses cutting costs? There is no information on that in the full press release at ec.europa.eu/commission/pressc…

Als Antwort auf European Commission

finkhaeuser.de/2026-03-17-ai-i…
Als Antwort auf Jay Thoden van Velzen ☁️​🛡️​

Hi, @jaythvv Thank you for your comment. The initiative aims to support AI skills, innovation and access to infrastructure across Europe, including for businesses, researchers and people developing AI skills.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

Didn't take long before you decided to try some vibe governing!

A.I isn't the answer to whatever question you have asked. It isn't the answer to any question, except; how can we screw up the lives of 450million people!

Als Antwort auf European Commission

AI is extremely bad for the environment, which is supposed to be one of the other things you're focused on.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

Please -- be specific in what you mean by AI and what your goals are.

Do you mean LLMs? The goal of companies pushing LLMs are to eliminate white collar jobs. Is that your goal?

Do you mean data centers? Power-hungry, very hot centers where the expensive technology is out of date before it's installed?

Do you mean something else? One way you can really lead in AI is to keep your population educated (The EU does well with this) and to create a culture where failure is not forever (The EU is not so good at this.)

Good luck.

Als Antwort auf European Commission

Fuuuuuick that. AI is a planet-killing self-genocidal fad that no one should support.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

Are you trying to make us Brits feel good about #Brexit?

Until now, I've always thought Brexit was a complete disaster, but if that's the way the EU is going, I'm starting to think that maybe there was something in it after all.

Als Antwort auf European Commission

cost cutting sounds good, but when it's at the expense of user privacy such as in the case of the digital omnibus, I can't say that I'm a fan.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

Dear Commission
We do not asked any LLM rebranded as AI:
We asked human rights respect, affordable housing, less fossil energy, no more wars or genocides, no electronic slavery from USA's big fascistech.
Apparently you are attemping to give us exactly the contrary of what EU citizens asked. It's clearly not our fault.
Please stop and change direction.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

ugg, more capitalist Kool-aid chugging, devoid of any real-world value. please stop embarrassing yourselves.

worst part is, still safer and more prosperous than America. 😔

Als Antwort auf European Commission

But no-one wants "AI" in everything. Can you not read the feedback? This is just another stock market bubble and it will burst.

The tech is disastrous for anything seriously consequential, and won't get any better because it's polluting its own training material, day by day.

You're gullible fools, the lot of you. Pathetic. By all means outsource your own human brains to a parrot puppet made by billionaires, but don't drag the rest of us into it.

We prefer to think for ourselves.

Als Antwort auf European Commission

an "omnibus cutting costs for business" aka "deregulation trojan horse cosplaying as beaurocracy reduction"

I like the EU for a lot of reasons. But nothing mentioned in this post is one of them.

At least have the dignity and preciseness to call it LLMs because I bet my hat that's what you by and large mean when you say AI.

Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (2 Wochen her)
Als Antwort auf European Commission

don't do this shit. Please don't fall for the same crap from techbros than the US.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

No you fucking aren't "building a secure and innovative AI future" for anyone. AI is destructive for everyone and everything.

I want my taxes refunded, as you clearly can't be trusted not to use them to fund sociopathic far-right grifters.

Als Antwort auf European Commission

We don't need "AI factories". We need clean energy, strong support for free software, good public infrastructures and political courage to fight fascism.
Als Antwort auf European Commission

"We are building a secure and innovative AI future for Europe."

There is no such thing. You are wasting money on slop.